Allowed

Akhilesh Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC29 Jun 2021BAIL/12815/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court Criminal Misc. Bail Application allowed the petitioner Akhilesh Yadav to be released on bail in a case involving murder, affray, and unlawful assembly. The court imposed several conditions including cooperation with the trial and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or committing new crimes, detailing consequences for breach.

What did the court decide?

The applicant to be enlarged on bail by executing a personal bond and two sureties.

Akhilesh Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 10

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12815 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Akhilesh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pavan Kishore,Mahendra Pratap Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

¶5

This Court is presently working on virtual mode only due to surge in Covid-19 cases.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that general role has been assigned against the applicant and other co-accused. No specific role has been assigned to any of the accused. It is next submitted that as per postmortem report, there are three anti mortem injuries on the body of the deceased out of which two injuries are on left leg and one is on the head which is fatal in nature, therefore, it cannot be said that who is author of the said injury. Applicant has no criminal history and he is in jail since 16.9.2020, undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Akhilesh Yadav , involved in Case Crime No. 267 of 2020, under Sections- 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Mehdawal, District Sant Kabir Nagar, be enlarged on bail on him executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. It is further provided that this bail order available on the official website of the High Court will be taken to be the authentic one and certified copy shall be submitted before that court concerned as soon as it is issued.

¶10

This bail order would be subject to the fulfilment of following conditions:-

¶11

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶12

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶13

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶14

The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

¶15

In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 29.6.2021 Swati

Akhilesh Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhilesh Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Maya Devi Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Janmejay Mishra and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Munna Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Dr. V.S. Upadhyay Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Khare Vs State of U.P. and Another