In this case, the Hon'ble Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by virtue of non-appearance of the applicants to press their claims on the application date and the date prior thereto.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 814 of 2020
Applicant :- Diwan And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Daya Shanker Lal Srivastava,Abhishek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None present for the applicants to press the application. On the previous date also none was present for the applicants. Hence, the anticipatory bail application is rejected in absence. Order Date :- 3.9.2021 Bhanu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Diwan And 5 Others
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
