Court rejected anticipation bail application in absence of applicant counsel despite opposing counsel's presence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 950 of 2021
Applicant :- Sanjay And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dileep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Darwari Lal,Darbari Lal
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None present for the applicants to press the application.
Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 is present.
On the last occasion also none was present from the side of applicants, hence, the anticipatory bail application is rejected in absence.
Order Date :- 2.9.2021 Bhanu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay And 3 Others
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
