Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J. rejected an anticipatory bail application rejected in absence as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls, deeming the purpose of filing to be over.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1108 of 2020
Applicant :- Subhawati Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jata Shankar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None present for the applicant to press the application despite repeated calls.
It appears that the purpose of filing this anticipatory bail application is over and therefore, the applicant is not pursuing this application.
The case relates to Case Crime No. 0079 of 2019, under section 363, 366 I.P.C. and it includes the offence under POCSO Act. Hence, the anticipatory bail application is rejected in absence.
Order Date :- 3.9.2021 Bhanu
Subhawati
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
