In chamber, the court rejected the anticipatory bail application seeking protection against arrest in a case involving Sections 409, 420, 467 IPC, citing the need for a thorough investigation.
Anticipatory bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In Chamber
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13955 of 2021
Applicant :- Suraj Tiwari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Asha Parihar,Pratik Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard Ms. Asha Parihar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
By means of the present application the applicant, Ali Hasan is seeking his anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.64 of 2021, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station-Kohna, District-Kanpur Nagar.
The investigation is going on and it would not be proper for the Court to interfere in the same.
Taking into account the role attributed to the applicant in commission of offence, the Court feels that in order to have indepth probe into the matter, the Investigating Officer of the case should be given fullest liberty to choose its own course for the transparent investigation. Thus, giving a panoramic view of the matter the Court is not inclined to exercise its powers in favour of the applicants, and thus the present anticipatory bail application is hereby REJECTED .
Order Date :- 21.9.2021 Abhishek Sri.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in the said under trial proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suraj Tiwari
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
