Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. rejected after the Sessions Court had previously denied relief. The court found no good grounds for indulgence in the specific case involving sexual offence allegations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In Chamber
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5086 of 2021
Applicant :- Awadh Raj Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dileep Kumar Yadava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anil Kumar Singh,Dharmendra Pratap Singh,Mohan Ram
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A and perused the record.
The instant application is being moved by the applicant namely, Awadh Raj Singh invoking the powers of Section 438 Cr.P.C. that he has every reason to believe that he may be arrested on the accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence in connection with Case Crime no. 1075 of 2020, under Sections 376(2)(N), 504 I.P.C., Police Station- Dhoomanganj, DistrictAllahabad.
From the record, it is evident that the applicant has approached this Court after getting his anticipatory bail rejected from the court of sessions vide order dated 05.02.2021.
After perusing the record, the Court finds no good ground to grant indulgence in favour of the applicant, accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands REJECTED .
Order Date :- 20.9.2021 Nisha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant accused of committing a non-bailable offence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Awadh Raj Singh
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
