Application under Section 482 CrPC was addressed by the Hon'ble Court after counsel did not appear for the applicant. The court disposed of the application due to efflux of time, rendering the prayer infructuous, while noting future bail petitions should be heard expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6279 of 2007
Applicant :- Shakeel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Aditya Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This application is of the year 2007. It appears that by the efflux of time the contesting parties have either lost all interest in the subject matter or the prayer made in this application has been rendered infructuous or no cause of action survives.
Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it is provided that in case the applicant applies for bail, the prayer for bail shall be considered expeditiously in accordance with law after hearing the Public Prosecutor
It is further provided that in case the present application survives, the applicant is at liberty to move an application for recalling of this order.
Order Date :- 16.7.2021 SP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shakeel
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
