Subhash Chandra Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge Criminal Court disposed of an application under Section 482 filed in 2007. Finding that due to the efflux of time, the prayer had become infructuous and no cause of action survived, the court dismissed the application as such. Any interim order was vacated, but liberty was granted to recall the order if the applicant could later prove the application still survives.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time; interim order vacated; liberty granted to recall this order if application survives.