Daksha @ Dina v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal revision filed by Daksha @ Dina was disposed of in a one-line order, being dismissed as having become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Revision dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 277 of 2018
Revisionist :- Daksha @ Dina Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Mandvi Tripathi,Santosh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Smt. Alka Upadhyay, Advocate holding brief of Sri Santosh Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that this revision has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the revisionist, this revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.7.2021 SA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Daksha @ Dina
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/277/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court