This order disposed of a writ petition seeking to quash the petitioner's disqualification as a company director and restore his DIN usage. The court relied on earlier judgments on the same issue and disposed of the petition in their terms.
The writ petition was disposed of in the same terms as the referred judgments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3550 of 2020
Petitioner :- Mohd.Tabrez Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Chandani Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order by which the petitioner has been disqualified to continue as a Director of the Company and also allow him to use his Digital Signature Certificate and Director Identification Number (DIN).
Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon two judgments of this Court, one passed in bunch lead by Writ-C No.12498 of 2019 (Jai Shankar Agrahari and others Vs. Union of India) dated 16.01.2020 and other in Misc. Bench No.17069 of 2019 (Ariz Abbas Vs. Union of India & Others) dated 25.09.2019 and prayed that the issue raised in the instant petition is squarely covered and set at rest by the judgments aforesaid.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute the said fact. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms.
Order Date :- 3.2.2020 pks
Mohd. Tabrez
Union Of India
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
