Petitioner challenged civil and revenue disputes before the High Court. The Court held it was not inclined to interfere at this stage and dismissed the petition.
Writ Petition dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3510 of 2020
Petitioner :- Rajeshwari Devi Alias Munni Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.B. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri R.B. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri B.P.S. Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State.
The petitioner has disputes of civil and revenue nature.
It is open to him to take recourse to the remedies available to him under the law.
We are not inclined to interfere in this matter at this stage under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Order Date :- 3.2.2020 S.P.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajeshwari Devi Alias Munni Devi
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
