This writ petition was dismissed. The Court held that the petitioner had no real grievance against the third respondent and could pursue complaints before the appropriate authority.
The Writ Petition was dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2363 of 2020
Petitioner :- Murari Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vidya Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondentsState and Sri D.K. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the respondent no.3.
The petitioner has no real grievance against the respondent no.3. This petition is only in the nature of complaint and other complaints have also been raised by the petitioner from time to time against the respondent no.3.
It is open to the petitioner to pursue his complaints before the appropriate authority. The Writ Court will not interfere in this matter at this stage.
The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Order Date :- 23.1.2020 S.P.
Murari Yadav
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
