Single paragraph order dismissing a writ petition where a visually handicapped petitioner claimed denial of scribe services but was rejected because he never applied for one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7713 of 2020
Petitioner :- Mantosh Respondent :- Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,M.N. Singh
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
The petitioner is a visually handicapped candidate. He claims that the services of scribe were denied to him. The examinations have been concluded.
Sri M.N.Singh, learned counsel for the respondentCommission on the basis of instructions submits that the petitioner never applied for a scribe before the Commission.
These facts could not be disputed on behalf of the petitioner.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 15.10.2020 Ashish Tripathi
Mantosh
Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
