The Court granted bail to the accused applicant in a cheating-related criminal case. Bail was allowed on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions preventing interference with evidence and witnesses, authored by Hon'ble Subhash Chand, J.
Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties under specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40677 of 2020
Applicant :- Anil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Sisodia,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chand,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant(s), learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
This bail application has been preferred by the accusedapplicant(s) Anil, who is involved in Case Crime No.304 of 2020 under Sections 420,482,411,413,414 I.P.C. P.S. Najibabad, District-Bijnor.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that co-accused Sachin @ Bholu having similar role to that of applicant has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 5.11.2020 therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has has no previous criminal history,he is not likely to abscond.
On behalf of State bail has been opposed but learned A.G.A. conceded on the point of parity.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and going through the record, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let applicant(s) Anil be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(i) The applicant(s) shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant(s) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant(s) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant(s) shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by
the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, liberty is given to the trial court to cancel the bail of the applicant(s) without any reference to this Court.
Order Date :- 23.11.2020 SKS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under the facts and circumstances of the case.
Whether the parity principle applies as a co-accused has already been granted bail.
Anil
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
