Allowed

Mustakeem v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2020BAIL/26575/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge criminal bail order allowed the applicant Mustakeem to be released on bail under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The petitioner was granted release on a personal bond and two local sureties, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence and appearing in court.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a personal bond and two local sureties each of an amount to be fixed by the concerned court.

Mustakeem Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26575 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Mustakeem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Faizur Rahman Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the police station in the bail application as Moosanagar in place of Bhoganipur.

¶7

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart, copy of which has been filed as annexure-1 to the affidavit, only one case is pending against the applicant. It is also contended that in the aforesaid case the applicant has already been enlarged on bail, photocopy of which is filed as annexure-2 to the affidavit, and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next contended that the applicant is in jail since 12.02.2020 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. It is further contended that co-accused Arif @ Guttu has been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 24350 of 2020, Arif @ Gattu v. State of U.P., vide order dated 31.08.2020.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Perused the first information report as well as the averments made in the application.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Mustakeem, involved in Case Crime No. 114 of 2020, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Moosanagar, district Kanpur Dehat be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that :

¶11

the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶12

the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

¶13

the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶14

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the order granting bail shall automatically be vacated. Order Date :- 9.9.2020 SKT/-

Mustakeem v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mustakeem v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Urmila Devi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Avdhesh Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Gajanan Dubey Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Mohd. Saif Vs State of U.P.

Ayub Vs State of U.P.

Tajeem Vs State of U.P.