Ajay Pal v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
An application for anticipatory bail rendered infructuous and was dismissed without substantive consideration.
An application for anticipatory bail rendered infructuous and was dismissed without substantive consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2 of 2020
Applicant :- Ajay Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant stated that this application has been rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 6.1.2020 Arun K. Singh
(Yashwant Varma, J.)
Ajay Pal
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court