The High Court rejected an application seeking interim anticipatory bail. Applying a rigid standard, the court found no ground to grant bail due to the grievous nature of injuries inflicted on the complainant as per the medical report, stating the allegations warranted arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14 of 2020
Applicant :- Chatar Singh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri I.P. Srivastava,the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in light of the apprehension of the arrest of the applicants in Case Crime No. 456 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 324, 307, 352, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District- Bulandshahr.
Bearing in mind the allegations which are levelled and the grievous nature of the injuries which have been inflicted and are duly borne out from the medical examination report, the Court finds no ground to accord the facility of interim anticipatory bail to the applicants.
The prayer so made is consequently refused.
The Application is consequently rejected .
Order Date :- 6.1.2020 Arun K. Singh
(Yashwant Varma, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim anticipatory bail should be granted in light of apprehension of arrest under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 324, 307, 352, 504, 506 IPC?
Chatar Singh And 3 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
