This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition against the State of U.P., noting that alternative statutory remedies were available and an appeal was already pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 180 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S M.G. Agro Industries Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Sisodia,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Instructions have come. It is taken on record. The petitioner has already taken recourse to the other statutory remedies. It is open to him to pursue the appeal, already filed by him. We are not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 14.2.2019 pks
M/S M.G. Agro Industries
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
