Petitioner sought relief regarding tax recovery. Court allowed 15 days to deposit tax and stayed coercive measures. Penalty appeal avenue kept open.
Time of 15 days allowed for tax deposit; coercive measures stayed for 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 168 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ramanuj Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Vikram Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri A.V. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the amount of tax, which is sought to be recovered against him. We, therefore, allow 15 days' time from today to make the deposit.
Insofar as the penalty is concerned, it is open to him to file an appeal before the appropriate authority.
For a period of 15 days from today, no coercive measures shall be taken against the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Order Date :- 14.2.2019 pks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner shall be granted time to deposit the disputed tax amount.
Ramanuj Yadav
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
