The High Court of Judicature at All India reduced the file and noted that the petitioner did not appear to press the writ petition. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution without merits being considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7878 of 2009
Petitioner :- M/S Hind Agro Industries And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. However, Sri P.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 18.12.2019 IrfanUddin
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
M/S Hind Agro Industries And Another
State of U.P. and Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
