The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 61658 of 2009 for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear to press the matter; any interim order was vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 61658 of 2009
Petitioner :- Kunwar Ajay Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Umanath Pandey
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition. However, Sri S.N.Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Kunwar Ajay Singh
State of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
