have resulted in a valid agreement being executed in favor of that Shobha Ram, instead, what we find is, that after the report was submitted on 25.4.2018 and hearing was held on the same date, the Executive Officer was directed to verify the records of the two rival parties. The Executive Officer has submitted the report on 4.5.2018 to the effect that while the agreement was executed in favor of the present petitioner-Smt. Rahisha Begum under the signatures of Sri Kant Mishra only, there were signatures found to be valid of Adarsh Kumar Mishra, the then Chairman alongwith the then Executive Officer, Sri Amar Singh on the agreement of Shobha Ram. We fail to understand as to when a counter affidavit had been sworn by the then Chairman, Adarsh Kumar Mishra himself in Writ Petition No.49577 of 2005, stating categorically in paragraph no.7 that no allotment order had ever been made in favor of the petitioner, how his signatures could be verified. There is no statement of Adarsh Kumar Mishra available on record, to the effect that it was his signatures on the document of agreement. Under the circumstances it can be concluded very safely that till the date of swearing of the affidavit in the High Court by the then Chairman, Adarsh Kumar Mishra in September 2005 there was no such agreement in existence. Subsequently an agreement came to be executed is a questionable issue but atleast one thing is very much clear that no allotment order ever existed in favor of Shobha Ram. Under the circumstances no valid agreement could have been executed and if any signatures have been obtained on such agreement that will not create any legally enforceable right in favor of
