In a called-on-revise writ petition where the petitioner did not appear, the High Court held that the matter had become infructuous and dismissed the petition, vacating any interim order.
Petition dismissed. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39194 of 2006
Petitioner :- Deepak Mitra Respondent :- U.P. Financial Corporation And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kushal Kant Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.A. Khan
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 6.8.2019 Manish Tripathi
Deepak Mitra
U.P. Financial Corporation
Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
Manish Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
