The High Court held this intra-Court appeal as a gross abuse of process since the appellant raised grounds on merits that were given up before the Single Judge, reversing the lower court's direction to expedite inquiry.
The appeal was dismissed and the appellant was imposed a ₹5,000 cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 876 of 2019
Appellant :- Shadi Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Shesh Kumar Srivastava,Sunil Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar Jagdish
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
"Although, this petition impugns an order passed by the District Magistrate seizing the financial and administrative powers of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner has only prayed for directions being issued commanding the District Magistrate to conclude the final enquiry with expedition ." (emphasis added)
Order Date :- 6.8.2019 KA
Shadi Ram
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
