In this writ petition called in revise, the High Court dismissed the matter as the petitioner counsel was absent and the court held the cause of action may no longer survive or the matter has become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed; any interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 44040 of 2006
Petitioner :- Nishith Tripathi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Misrha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 5.8.2019 Manish Tripathi
Nishith Tripathi
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
