In this writ petition called in revise, the court found the petitioner absent and held the cause of action either exhausted or satisfied. The matter was deemed infructuous and decided without merits. The writ petition was dismissed and any interim order vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed and any interim order standing vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33081 of 2006
Petitioner :- A.D.A. Allahabad Thru Vice Chairman Respondent :- State And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok K. Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 6.8.2019 Manish Tripathi
A.D.A. Allahabad
State
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
