The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner to press the matter. Any interim order stands vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3758 of 2018
Petitioner :- Khaga Sahkari Krya Vikrya Samiti Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Taniya Pandey
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Ms. Taniya Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.5 is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.8.2019 SFH
(Dr.Y.K.Srivastava,J.)
Khaga Sahkari Krya Vikrya Samiti
Respondent no.5
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
