The High Court treated a writ challenge by Basic Shiksha Vibhag Jaunpur against officials of the Employees Provident Fund Organization as withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was dismissed accordingly without substantive argument.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26385 of 2019
Petitioner :- Basic Shiksha Vibhag Jaunpur Respondent :- Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization Counsel for Petitioner :- Anuj Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- Sachindra Upadhyay,Kartikeya Saran
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Sarvesh Dubey, learned counsel appearing alongwith Sri Anuj Agrawal for the petitioner prays that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Sri Ujjwal Satsangi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kartikeya Saran, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 has no objection to the prayer so made.
As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 19.8.2019 Shahroz
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
Basic Shiksha Vibhag Jaunpur
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Employees Provident Fund Organization
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
