State of U.P. and Another v. Shambhu Nath Yadav and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22680 of 2019…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22680 of 2019…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22680 of 2019
Petitioner :- State Of U.P. And Another Respondent :- Shambhu Nath Yadav And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Devendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Srivastava,Anil Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
The present writ petition seeks to challenge the order dated 31.08.2018 passed by the Controlling Authority, under the Payment of Gratuity Act/Assistant Labour Commissioner U.P., Prayagraj.
Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the petitioners at the very outset submits that certain relevant facts necessary for adjudication of the controversy involved could not be placed before the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act/Assistant Labour Commissioner U.P., Prayagraj, when the matter was pending before the said Authority.
Accordingly, a prayer is made to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the Controlling Authority and place the relevant facts before the authority concerned by moving an appropriate application.
Sri Gaurav Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 has no objection to the prayer so made.
As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
Order Date :- 19.8.2019 Shahroz
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
State Of U.P.
Shambhu Nath Yadav
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court