Disposed

Manish Chaudhary and 67 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC17 Dec 2019WRIC/36803/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition filed by 68 students seeking re-checking of their Mathematics and English answer sheets. The respondent undertook to re-check copies via the examining body, but the court did not permit internal inspection by counsel due to the large number of applicants.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; applicants to approach Additional Secretary, Madhyamic Shiksha Parishad for date of copy inspection.

Manish Chaudhary and 67 Others Vs State of U.P… — Education and Admissions | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 54

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36803 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- Manish Chaudhary And 67 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abrar Ahmad Siddiqui,Mary Puncha (Sheeb Jose),Mohd. Kalim Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Anurag Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶6

Present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners, who are 68 in numbers, for issuance of direction to the respondents to re-check/re-evaluate the answer sheets of Mathematics subject of Intermediate Examination for the year 2019 conducted by Madhyamic Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh in which they were awarded zero marks out of hundred and in English subject marks were very less and they have been declared failed.

¶7

This Court vide order dated 19.11.2019 directed learned Standing Counsel to seek instructions in the matter and produce the copies of Mathematics. On the instructions received by learned Standing Counsel, copies are produced before this Court, but since more than 500 students approached this Court, therefore, it is not possible to permit the learned counsel for the petitioners to check the copies.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has produced the letter dated 11.12.2019 in which the copies were re-checked by the subject expert and some of the students' marks were changed, but the marks of the remaining students remained unchanged.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel submits that fresh mark sheet will be issued to the candidates, whose marks were changed after checking of the copies in question by the subject expert. Learned Standing Counsel further submits that it is not possible to permit the learned counsel for the petitioners to check the copies in the Court itself and for that purpose learned counsel for the petitioners should approach the Additional Secretary, Madhyamic Shiksha Parishad, Regional Office, Meerut within a week for fixing the date for checking the copies in question.

¶10

Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶11

Order Date :- 17.12.2019 T. Sinha

Manish Chaudhary and 67 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Chaudhary and 67 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshwar @ Ram Mehar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Chhohari Devi Balika Anusuchit Prathmik Vidyalaya Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Jhuggi Jhopadi Welfare Association and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

C/M Adarsh Junior High School Ganj Dundwara and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Brij Kishore Nirmla Devi Mahavidyalaya and 19 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Shanoo and 3 Ors. Vs Land Management Committee Patwai Shahbad Rampur and 3 Ors.