Writ petitions before Court No. - 54 were dismissed as there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioners to press the matters on the hearing date.
The writ petitions were dismissed for want of prosecution and interim order, if any, discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 54
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36129 of 2019
Petitioner :- Brij Kishore Nirmla Devi Mahavidyalaya And 19 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mohan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rohit Pandey
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
List has been revised.
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition.
Ms. Shambhavi Tiwari holding brief of Sri Rohit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019
Noman
Brij Kishore Nirmla Devi Mahavidyalaya And 19 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Rajiv Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
