The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Neha Ent Udyog holding it not maintainable on the ground of exhaustion of statutory appeal remedy.
Writ petition dismissed on grounds of having alternative statutory remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31345 of 2017
Petitioner :- M/S Neha Ent Udyog Thru Proprietor Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mrityunjay Dwivedi,Ayub Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
The Supreme Court in the case of Jai Singh versus Union of India and others, 1977 SCR (2) 137 has consistently followed that writ petition is not maintainable in case petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of a parallel remedy.
Order Date :- 6.5.2019 A.N. Mishra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable given the existence of a statutory appeal remedy.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jai Singh versus Union of India and others, 1977 SCR (2) 137Referred¶5
Jai Singh versus Union of India and others, 1977 SCR (2) 137 · Who else cites this
M/S Neha Ent Udyog Thru Proprietor
State Of U.P
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
