Writ petition filed challenging the Special Judge's judgment dismissing a revision petition. The High Court found no perversity or error apparent on record regarding limitation on execution. Dismissal upheld.
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29942 of 1991
Petitioner :- Babu Ram Respondent :- Special Judge Counsel for Petitioner :- M.A.Zaidi,Anjani Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- Rajesh Srivastava,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 26.11.2019 AK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the finding on execution not being barred by limitation was perverse or error apparent on record.
Babu Ram
Special Judge
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
