The High Court dismissed the writ petition as it appeared to be infructuous. The petitioner did not appear, and the interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22294 of 2005
Petitioner :- Nagendra Nath Tripathi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 25.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Nagendra Nath Tripathi
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
