Writ petition dismissed as cause of action appeared to have ceased or matter was infructuous due to absence of petitioner's counsel and lack of interest in deciding merits. Interim order vacated.
Writ petition dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 26496 of 2005
Petitioner :- Om Prakash Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secy. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Srivastava,Ashok Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 25.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Om Prakash Tripathi
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
