The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's absence when the case was called in the revised list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 64135 of 2007
Petitioner :- Digvijay Nath Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Narain,S.C.Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajai Singh
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
None for the petitioner even when the case is called in revised list.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 21.11.2019 S.Sharma
Digvijay Nath
The State Of U.P.
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
