The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of effort to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15238 of 2007
Petitioner :- Dinesh Chaubey Respondent :- U.P. State Roadways Transport Corporation And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- O.P. Pandey,Samir Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.K. Gupta, ,G.P.Gupta,S.C.,Sunil Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.11.2019 Sattyarth
Dinesh Chaubey
U.P. State Roadways Transport Corporation
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
