This judgment allowed an intervention application in Writ A No. 557 of 2019, then allowed the principal writ petition by reference to a separate order.
Intervention application allowed; Writ petition allowed with reference to another order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 557 of 2019
Petitioner :- Kul Bhushan Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendu Ojha,Alok Dwivedi,Radha Kant Ojha, Sr. Advocate,Satyendra Chandra Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Sri Alok Dwivedi, learned counsel has filed intervention application in this case.
The application is allowed.
Order Date :- 3.4.2019 M.A.Ansari
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 557 of 2019
Petitioner :- Kul Bhushan Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendu Ojha,Alok Dwivedi,Radha Kant Ojha, Sr. Advocate,Satyendra Chandra Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
The writ petition is allowed.
For orders, see my order of date passed in leading writ petition being Writ A No. 713 of 2019 (Reena Singh and 74 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others).
Order Date :- 3.4.2019 M.A.Ansari
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Reena Singh and 74 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 othersReferred¶13
Writ A No. 713 of 2019
Kul Bhushan Mishra
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
