The writ petition was allowed. The referring order details the decision adopted in a connected leading writ petition filed on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1033 of 2019
Petitioner :- Punam Yadav And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhaiya Lal Yadav,Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
The writ petition is allowed.
For orders, see my order of date passed in leading writ petition being Writ A No. 713 of 2019 (Reena Singh and 74 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others). Order Date :- 3.4.2019 M.A.Ansari
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ A No. 713 of 2019 (Reena Singh and 74 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others)Referred¶6
Punam Yadav And 7 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
