Petitioner filed a writ petition which was allowed by the Hon'ble High Court of Puja Padia, J. The court dismissed the petition seeing the need, discipleship, distinguished referenced in the case, all considered, refused to go into, etc.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1026 of 2019
Petitioner :- Jarrar Ali And 63 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishe Pandey,Sushil Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shyam Krishna Gupta
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
The writ petition is allowed.
For orders, see my order of date passed in leading writ petition being Writ A No. 713 of 2019 (Reena Singh and 74 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others).
Order Date :- 3.4.2019
M.A.Ansari
Jarrar Ali and 63 Others
State of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
