The single judge held that the writ petition became infructuous due to the passage of time and dismissed it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 41555 of 2008
Petitioner :- Heera Lal Sahu Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.N.Singh,C.P.Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Khare,Ashok Mishra,R.P.Tiwari
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Sri Vineet Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri H.N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous by passage of time and, therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 11.12.2019 NLY
Heera Lal Sahu
State of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
