High Court disposed of writ petition directing respondent to decide a specific case under Section 41 of U.P. Revenue Act within six months, after hearing parties, to serve useful purpose.
Respondent directed to decide Case No. T201902030306561 of 2011 under Section 41 of U.P. Revenue Act within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39687 of 2019
Petitioner :- Rajeev Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Tripathi,Rama Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Heard Sri Pankaj Agarwal holding brief of Sri Rama Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
The only relief pressed in this petition is that the respondent No.2 may be directed to decide the Case No.T201902030306561 of 2011 (Rajeev Singh vs. State of U.P. and others) under Section 41 of U.P. Revenue Act, within a time bound period.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, no useful purpose will be served to keep this petition pending and call for a counter affidavit.
In view of the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of directing the concerned respondent to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within six months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
Order Date :- 7.12.2019 NLY
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent should be directed to decide the specified case expeditiously under Section 41 of U.P. Revenue Act.
Whether it is necessary to call for a counter affidavit from the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajeev Singh
State of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
