The court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order attaching the petitioner as head-clerk. The petitioner did not appear personally in the revised call.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39918 of 2009
Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
By the impugned order dated 05.05.2009, the petitioner has been attached as head-clerk in the branch. I do not find any legal infirmity in the impugned order.
That apart, none appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call. Learned standing counsel is present.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 NLY
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appointment of the petitioner as head-clerk in the branch is legally flawed.
Ramesh Chandra
State of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
