This writ petition challenging a transfer order was dismissed on the ground that transfer is an exigency of service for transferable posts. Interim orders, if any, were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2005 of 2008
Petitioner :- Balveer Singh And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
This writ petition has been filed against a transfer order. Undisputedly, the petitioners were working on a transferable post. Transfer is an exigency of service. Therefore, no interference is required.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed .
Interim order, if any, granted earlier is vacated.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 NLY
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with a transfer order issued to petitioner?
Balveer Singh And Others
State of U.P. and Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
