A single judge dismissed a writ petition challenging T.G.T. selection results filed two years after the result was declared, holding the petition was barred by laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16872 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jata Shankar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard Sri Jata Shankar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satyaveer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2- U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board.
By means of this writ petition the petitioner is challenging the result of selection of Trained Graduate Teachers (T.G.T.) declared by the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board.
It is submitted that result etc. have all been declared and selected candidates have been joined way back in the year 2017 itself. No explanation has been given by the petitioner as to why he has come to this Court after two years of declaration of result.
The writ petition is barred by laches and is dismissed accordingly.
Date :- 1.11.2019 Pkb/
Sanjeev Kumar
State Of U.P.
U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board
Abhinava Upadhya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
