The Single Judge dismissed the writ petition against a private Committee of Management, holding it non-maintainable based on the Supreme Court's decision in Trigun Chandra Thakur.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17048 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Pratima Chandra Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Veerendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri A.K.Yadav, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3.
This is a writ petition against private Committee of Management and the Supreme Court in the case of Trigun Chandra Thakur Vs. State of Bihar and others passed in Civil Appeal No.(S) 10003 of 2010 decided on 9.7.2019 has held that the writ petitions are not maintainable against private Committee of Management.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 31.10.2019 SKM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition against a private Committee of Management is maintainable given the Supreme Court ruling in Trigun Chandra Thakur.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Trigun Chandra Thakur Vs. State of Bihar and othersDistinguished¶6
Trigun Chandra Thakur Vs. State of Bihar and others, Civil Appeal No.(S) 10003 of 2010
Smt. Pratima Chandra
State Of U P
Abhinava Upadhya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
