In this PIL, the petitioner sought directions for compliance with Supreme Court orders regarding vacant posts and documentation, arguing this Court lacked authority. The bench held mandamus could not be issued and dismissed the petition.
Petitioner's prayers for directions to respondents and issuance of mandamus were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 735 of 2019
Petitioner :- Vishesh Rajvanshi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
2. Direct the Respondent Authorities to bring on record the total number of vacant posts till date and a proposed plan to fill up these posts.
3. Take strict action against the Respondent Authorities in case the directions of the Apex Court mentioned in Annexure No.3 are not followed.
4. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice.
5. Award the cost of petition to the petitioner."
Order Date :- 19.4.2019 Akram
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court can direct compliance with Supreme Court directions under Article 145 of the Constitution.
Whether contempt proceedings for disobeying Supreme Court orders lie in this Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishesh Rajvanshi
State Of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
