The Court held that the special appeal filed under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 is not maintainable in view of Full Bench judgment in Sheet Gupta, and dismissed it as not maintainable.
Special appeal dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 373 of 2019
Appellant :- Virendra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Nand Lal Pandey,Satyaveer Singh,Suyash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Virendra Kumar Jaiswal
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 18.4.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the intra-Court appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sheet Gupta Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and othersApplied¶6
Sheet Gupta Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others 2010 (1) ADJ 1
Virendra Yadav
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
