The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. No substantive legal issues were decided, and the order disposed of the matter on procedural grounds.
The criminal revision petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 98 of 2001
Revisionist :- Jai Veer Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- K.K. Dwivedi,R.P. Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Dhirendra Bahadur Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. K.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the revisionists and the learned A.G.A. representing the opposite party No. 1.
Mr. Dhirendra Bahadur Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. K.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the revisionists submits that the present criminal revision has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. Accordingly, the same be dismissed.
In view of the statement of Dhirendra Bahadur Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. K.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the revisionists, the revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.7.2019 HSM
Jai Veer Singh
And Another
State Of U.P.
And Another
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
