In a criminal revision filed beyond the limitation period, the High Court accepted a condonation application but rejected it for lack of prosecution. The substantive revision was subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant did not appear.
The criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 279 of 2001
Revisionist :- Ram Pratap Opposite Party :- Attri Prasad And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rama Nand Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Crl. Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. Of 2001
Case called in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this criminal revision. Learned A.G.A. Representing the opposite party No. 5 is present. This Crl. Revision was presented before this Court beyond the period of limitation. Accordingly, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the present Crl. Revision. As no one appears to press this delay condonation application, it is accordingly rejected for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.7.2019 Manish Tripathi
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 279 of 2001
Revisionist :- Ram Pratap Opposite Party :- Attri Prasad And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rama Nand Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears on behalf of revisionist.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 18.7.2019 Manish Tripathi
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Pratap
Attri Prasad And Others
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
